Even two coal mining companies will not be mining the same coal seam, or mining the same kind of coal, or selling coal into the same market. This is not that surprising, since it is very unlikely that two proxy companies will have identical systematic business risk. Averaging asset betasĪfter the equity betas of several proxy companies have been ungeared, it is usually found that the resulting asset betas have slightly different values. Similarly, the amended asset beta formula is called the ‘ungearing formula’. Since this calculation removes the effect of the financial risk or gearing of the proxy company from the proxy beta, it is usually called ‘ungearing the equity beta’. If the equity beta, the gearing, and the tax rate of the proxy company are known, this amended asset beta formula can be used to calculate the proxy company’s asset beta. This formula is included in the formulae sheet and is as follows: In the first article in this series, we introduced the idea of the asset beta, which is linked to the equity beta by the asset beta formula. The systematic risk represented by equity betas, therefore, includes both business risk and financial risk. The reason for this is that equity betas reflect not only the business risk of a company’s operations, but also the financial risk of a company. If you were to look at the equity betas of several coal mining companies, however, it is very unlikely that they would all have the same value.
For example, the proxy betas from several coal mining companies ought to represent the business risk of an investment in coal mining. Since their equity betas represent the business risk of the proxy companies’ business operations, they are referred to as ‘proxy equity betas’ or ‘proxy betas’.įrom a CAPM point of view, these proxy betas can be used to represent the business risk of the proposed investment project. Companies undertaking similar business operations to a proposed investment are known as ‘proxy companies’. For example, if a food processing company was looking at an investment in coal mining, it would need to locate some coal mining companies. The first step in using the CAPM to calculate a project-specific discount rate is to look for companies whose business operations are similar to the proposed investment project. Instead, the CAPM can be used to calculate a project-specific discount rate that reflects the business risk of the investment project.
This means that it is not appropriate to use the investing company’s existing cost of capital as the discount rate for the investment project. When the business risk of an investment project differs from the business risk of the investing company, the return required on the investment project is different from the average return required on the investing company’s existing business operations. The final article will look at the theory, advantages, and disadvantages of the CAPM.Īs mentioned in the first article in this series, the CAPM is a method of calculating the return required on an investment, based on an assessment of its risk.
CAPITAL ASSET PRICING MODEL SERIES
The first article in the series introduced the CAPM and its components, showed how the model could be used to estimate the cost of equity, and introduced the asset beta formula. This article, is the second in a series of three, and looks at applying the CAPM in calculating a project-specific discount rate to use in investment appraisal. Section E of the Study Guide for Financial Management contains several references to the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM).
CAPITAL ASSET PRICING MODEL PROFESSIONAL